poniatowski said:I thought the little 'holes' in the ends of the bandeau on the original plate you posted were interesting. (on the left, looking at the back) I wonder what they were for?
Ron
Leone said:poniatowski said:I thought the little 'holes' in the ends of the bandeau on the original plate you posted were interesting. (on the left, looking at the back) I wonder what they were for?
Ron
I was thinking about it too. Maybe in first it was for to fix these at the posts. Actually if to put these holes together the bandeau should get a circle. :-k :-k :-k
poniatowski said:Leone said:poniatowski said:I thought the little 'holes' in the ends of the bandeau on the original plate you posted were interesting. (on the left, looking at the back) I wonder what they were for?
Ron
I was thinking about it too. Maybe in first it was for to fix these at the posts. Actually if to put these holes together the bandeau should get a circle. :-k :-k :-k
I thought about that too, but wouldn't that obscure the text? hmmm... going to have to check that out.
Ron
Adler said:For me this plate is a reproduction. Here are the reasons why I think so:
- not enough detail at the back
- not enough detail at the front
- strange threaded posts
- sloppy text on bandeau, not well centered
- sloppy text on bandeau, distance between letters is different
- an officer's helmet plate without mercury guilding?
- the circular bandeau isn't really a circle (as it should be)
Taking all these points together makes it hard to believe that this plate would be a real one...
Oh, and here's a picture to compare...
Adler